Peter Reynolds

The life and times of Peter Reynolds

Spectacular Spectator Drivel On Cannabis

with 13 comments

Melanie Phillips

A Zionist, Labour supporting, Daily Mail journalist – it’s hardly a good start is it? I should have known better than even to start reading her article in The Spectator.

This woman is a dangerous liar and propagandist.  Astonishingly, with breathtaking hypocrisy in promoting the most dangerous of drugs, The Spectator describes itself as “Champagne for the brain”.

Here is her article, reproduced without kind permission of The Spectator and my letter to the editor in response.

Yesterday morning, BBC Radio Four’s Today programme broadcast an interview with a professor of neuropharmacology, Roger Pertwee. Prof Pertwee was making an eyebrow-raising suggestion – that cannabis use should be licensed. His argument was as incoherent as it was irresponsible. He maintained, repeatedly, that all he wanted to do was to reduce the harm done by cannabis – from dangers which he appeared to define merely as smoking an adulterated form of the drug, or getting lung cancer from smoking it. So he wanted to restrict it to people whom it ‘wouldn’t harm’. They would use it in other ways than smoking it, so they wouldn’t get cancer. They would go along to their GP who would pronounce them fit enough to use it.


What about the harm that we know is done by cannabis itself to the brain — to cognition, to memory, to motivation, to personality? What about the tremendous increase in psychosis caused by cannabis use? What about the harm it does to other people in the user’s ambit?

Yes, said Prof Pertwee, indeed, his scheme wouldn’t reduce the harm done by cannabis itself.

What about all those millions more young people who would start using the drug and become addicted and do themselves and other people all that harm?

Yes, stammered Prof Pertwee, that would indeed be an enormous problem with his scheme. But all he wanted to do was, er, to reduce the harm. And when he’d chased his own tail round that pointless circle a few times, he fell back on ‘all I want to do is stimulate discussion’.

In short, it was a stupid and dangerous idea which even in its own terms made no sense whatever. Why on earth was this professor of neuropharmacology spouting such self-evident drivel on the BBC that even he himself had to keep demurring at his own argument?

What the BBC didn’t tell us was that Prof Pertwee was not some dispassionate expert who just happened to breeze into the studio with a cockeyed idea about turning GPs into cannabis pushers.

Prof Pertwee is Director of Pharmacology of GW Pharmaceuticals – which has a special Home Office licence to market a cannabinoid medicine called Sativex which is used to treat certain medical conditions.

His embargoed press release even said of his proposal:

‘I think this might be the way forward, but it might not work…  It depends on a private company being willing to produce a branded product’.

But it’s his own company which is best placed to do just that! In other words, the Today programme – as a result of its own lazy and frivolous bias in favour of drug legalisation,  which presumably meant it didn’t do due diligence in researching its interviewee because he had the Correct Opinion on drug policy – was played for a sucker by Big Pharma. It was used to give prime air-time to a piece of commercial advocacy which was passed off as a neutral policy discussion. Except that the product being promoted here wasn’t soap powder, but a drug that enslaves.

Who needs cannabis when the Beeb is so dopey already?

—– Original Message —–
From: Peter Reynolds
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:20 AM
Subject: Melanie Phillips, The Dopey Beeb, 15th September 2010

Dear Sir,

The disgraceful display of ignorance and propaganda about cannabis by Melanie Phillips cannot be allowed to stand unchallenged.

Her biogtry plumbs new depths of scandalous nonsense.

In the 1930s they used to say that cannabis makes white women promiscuous with black men. Ms Phillips continues on this shameful path of crass misinformation. She needs to do some research before inflicting her ignorance on readers any further.

I agree that Professor Pertwee was incoherent but he is an academic, not a professional communicator.  At least he was dispensing facts. Ms Phillips’ diatribe was, to say the very least, economical with the truth.

Cannabis does not harm the brain or damage cognition, memory, motivation or personality – at least no more than breathing oxygen does and a whole lot less than any other recreational drug.  The phrase “tremendous increase in psychosis” is just a bare-faced lie and that it harms “other people in the user’s ambit” is the very worst sort of journalistic hogwash.

By all means, Ms Phillips, wallow in your own deluded opinion but don’t use your position to spead such wicked, dangerous nonsense.  You should be ashamed of yourself!

Authoritarian scaremongers, political cowards and cheap scandal-seeking journalists have been urging scientists to prove that cannabis is harmful for well over 100 years.  They haven’t succeeded yet.  On the contrary, all the latest research proves that cannabis is a remarkably benign substance yet with some extraordinary medicinal properties. The endocannabinoid system, which was only discovered in 1998 is now known to be fundamental to life and good health.  The only source of cannabinoids outside the body is the cannabis plant.

I used to have time for Melanie Phillips and some degree of respect for her opinion.  I see now that she is just the same as any tabloid hack who cares not one jot for the truth, merely for cheap sensation and worthless rhetoric.

Yours sincerely,

Peter Reynolds

13 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. You can fool all of the people all of the time, if the advertising is right and the budget is big enough.

    Joseph Goebbels


    September 16, 2010 at 1:14 pm

    • But look what happened to him in the end. He had his six children killed while he and his wife killed themselves. The truth had the last laugh!

      I’m not necessarily asking for Melanie Phillips to suffer the same punishment. I’d be happy with a grovelling apology.

      Peter Reynolds

      September 16, 2010 at 1:28 pm

  2. […] Marijke van den Berg wrote an interesting post today Here’s a quick excerpt What about the harm that we know is done by cannabis itself to the brain — to cognition, to memory, to motivation, to personality? What about the tremendous increase in psychosis caused by cannabis use? What about the harm it does to … […]

  3. So you’ve got that lot over there as well, haha..?!

    Here in Sweden they’ve had a tight control for decades, but it is becoming increasingly harder for the drug dinosaurs to survive. 🙂

    Sam Zodiac

    September 16, 2010 at 11:54 pm

  4. I’ve been convinced we should decriminalise drugs and licence them much like alcohol for years. The question is about how we do it without losing abilities to stamp out community killing behaviour. The general aim of decriminalisation around the world has been to interfere more.
    One point I think gets inadequate attention in particular is why people take drugs, get pissed and so on. If life was so good, I wouldn’t. I can barely stand to be in general company without being half-pissed, so generally avoid it (company).

    The kind of rules I have in mind would allow heroin to be bought at a licensed chemist by someone capable of being polite and consumed in silence by people not a nuisance to others. Any breach of the conditions should lead to instant arrest and banging up with only water and charity treatment behind barbed-wire doing cold turkey.


    September 18, 2010 at 12:00 pm

  5. Hey. Doyou guys think that maybe before 2011 or in 2011 we will see cannabis at least decrim or legal here in the UK?


    September 18, 2010 at 1:41 pm

    • If I have to give you an answer then, regrettably, I think not. I think we have a long way to go yet. I hope I’m wrong!

      Peter Reynolds

      September 18, 2010 at 2:09 pm

  6. Its amazing how government still views cannabis as a political football at the expense of so much.

    What is wrong with going home after a hard (tax paying) productive day at work and rolling a nice charas or moroc hashish joint to enjoy with a beer or glass of wine? I have been for 10 years. Never hurt anyone, never robbed or abused, never gone crazy or even grown breasts…

    I hope at least by 2011 they let us grow up to 5 plants for personal use.

    The solution is simple but they refuse to see it and keep dragging the tired old prohabition horse up the never ending hill.

    Now someone tell me is this not insane?

    I think so


    September 18, 2010 at 3:08 pm

  7. Peter. Did you see this in the Guardian. Regarding what we discussed yester day as to weather cannabis will be acceptqable to the government it seems there is some move in the right direction.

    Lets hope this means we get coffee shops and the green light to grow.

    Also as its sunday and allot of our talk is serious as so is the cannabis issue, I thought this video would make us all smile a little.



    September 19, 2010 at 11:06 am

    • Thanks for pointing me to that. You never know, I could be wrong about my earlier pessimistic prediction. I do hope so!

      You might be interested to see this US organisation LEAP =- Law Enforcement Against Prohibition:

      Peter Reynolds

      September 19, 2010 at 12:05 pm

  8. Melanie Phillips simply doesn’t quit. She’s churned out yet more of the same in her latest Daily Mail article, she’s openly calling for “a war on drugs” saying it’s never happened. * slaps forehead*

    Jason (HomeGrown Outlaw)

    September 21, 2010 at 11:31 pm

  9. Architect! heads up dude! Watch out, she’s Pro-Cannibal!


    October 8, 2010 at 10:04 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: