Advertisements
Peter Reynolds
The life and times of Peter Reynolds
Pages
Recent Posts
- CLEAR Advises Department of Health and MHRA on Definition of Cannabis-Derived Medicinal Products.
- Nick Hurd MP, The Home Office And Their Massive Broken Promise On Medicinal Cannabis.
- Chuka Umunna Wants To Make Britain’s Failed Democracy Even More Dysfunctional.
- Review. Hydrology 9 Vaporiser.
- Sainsbury’s Now Stocking Legal Cannabis Products As UK Policy Looks Increasingly Shambolic.
- I Have Joined The Labour Party. #AndImATory
- The Victoria Derbyshire Show’s Next Interviewees Arrive At New Broadcasting House.
- Do Not Apologise, Boris. Resist The Smears, Jeremy.
- The Devious Defenders Of Israel’s Government And Their Fake Allegations of Antisemitism.
- The Definition Of A Cannabis-Derived Medicinal Product Must Include Standardised Herbal Cannabis Or Sajid Javid’s Reform Will Fail.
- Cannabis Trades Association Receives Official Endorsement From the MHRA.
- For All Those Small-Minded, Revisionist Students Who Don’t Understand History Is About The Past.
- The BBC’s Treatment Of Sir Cliff Richard Must Have Severe Consequences For The Individuals Responsible.
- Definition of Antisemitism
- The Conservative Party Is Destroying Britain. It Must Be Stopped. #AndImATory
- Two Years Of Conservatives Procrastinating Over The EU At Britain’s Expense. How Much Has That Cost?
- WARNING. CBD Flowers, Buds, Weed, Hash Are NOT Legal In The UK.
- Theresa May And The Conservative Government Are Both Treasonable And Corrupt.
- An ‘Expert Panel’ On Medicinal Cannabis Without A Single Expert On It?
- Deranged Politicians Interfering In The Oldest Profession Will Only Cause More Harm.
Peter Hitchens? LOL! What a hypocrite.
buddyhell
January 24, 2011 at 9:36 am
I won’t say I’m aroused, but I’m in that ballpark.
Great stuff you guys!
Jason Reed (HomeGrown Outlaw)
January 25, 2011 at 12:03 am
Peter, you like remarkably like Ian Anderson of Jethro Tull in that shot, around the time of the ‘Heavy Horses’ album 🙂 …… sorry, back to business, great stuff!
Lee Gramson
January 25, 2011 at 9:42 am
That’s what happens when you smoke too much! Disembodied heads everywhere!
http://www.news-medical.net/news/20091105/Re-classification-of-cannabis-will-have-minimal-impact-on-incidence-of-psychosis-says-study.aspx
Julian
January 25, 2011 at 3:50 pm
A visual representation of extreme schizophrenia, Mr Reynolds sometimes believes he is a horrible little twerp called “Peter Hitchens”. It is thought that Mr Reynolds uses this alternative personality to vent any need to be ignorant
Sam
January 25, 2011 at 6:17 pm
Is he after the pot plant or is he trying to go down on me?
Peter Reynolds
January 25, 2011 at 8:41 pm
Think it could be a bit of both Peter!
FFAAnon1
January 25, 2011 at 9:40 pm
With people like that sneaking up on you, you’ll need to relocate your extra set of eyes from the top of your head to the back.
NobblySan
January 25, 2011 at 10:52 pm
I wrote my full 500 word limit on the irritating Hitchens’s Blogg yesterday, and it didn’t accept it.
I’m so annoyed I’m going to try and repost it here!
Utter nonsense from Mr Hitchens as usual, his one man crusade against cannabis based on his own repugnant moral dilemmas amuse me, but concurrently send me into a furious rage sometimes. How on earth can a learned man, who has travelled extensively be so blind to the real reasons for prohibitions continuation?
Capitalisation not only of industries, but of ideas & solutions seems to have been the remit of our rulers, certainly for the past two decades. Peter points to this recently in his article detailing the NHS as a sickness maintenance service. My assertion is that prohibition is maintained primarily by a greedy judiciary, lawyers, civilian investigators operating in police stations and laterally, the police themselves, prison guards, probation officers etc.
Their collective dinner ticket is the status quo of prohibition, where everybody is failed. Peters answer of abstinence reminds me of Agness Weston’s pledge, a naive effort by an unrealistic, conceited, puritanical prig who bases his opinions on spite & malevolence.
An attitude of righteous retribution ( in the form of Criminal Justice ) as a reward for conforming to a national policy of abstinence, and being disappointed when there are not enough cells for those who choose not to unquestioningly obey these dubious laws is both grossly immature & self defeating for the country as a whole.
One final note, as a HIV+ medicinal user of cannabis I do not use the drug with tobacco. Neither do millions of bong & pipe smokers all over the world, which is why the issue of ” Marijuana cancer” is often discussed over the pond.
Nothing anybody says will ever convince Mr Hitchens of the irrationality of his position, not even his God can convince him that he has given us cannabis.
“Then God said, “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food” Genesis 1:29
certain theological interpretations will have it, that that does or does not include cannabis, but if I had gotten myself into a state of belief whereby I was set to confront the eternal creator of all upon my death, I would not have spent a life in print denouncing His answer to collagen induced arthritis! the jolly best of luck to you, I say!
yours sincerely
Ronnie
Wrexham
Ronnie James
January 26, 2011 at 1:33 pm